"Voluntary Conversion" is the change of one's medium but identifying oneself with every religion at the time of election is an "Apprehension of having Loose Motion" after the result of the election

Dr. Ambedkar needs no introduction except one 'he was a politician without politics because he was educated'. However, we can remember him, and therefore— born as society's untouchable for which in school he could only drink water if the school's peon had come which he famously remarked: "No peon, No Water" thereafter becoming the first Indian to pursue a doctorate in Economics abroad at Columbia University and the London School of Economics, then opposing Bapu for getting a reservation for the 'depressed classes' from there becoming the cynosure of our Constitution, and at last embracing Buddhism for his conviction but not for affiliation and promotion.
We are not taught about him in any sphere of our life, many know he is the father of our Constitution, few know he was the Chairman of the Constitution Drafting Committee, and a few know he championed depressed classes' rights. However, I am afraid that perhaps no one knows why he embraced Buddhism despite keeping his conviction as it was when he was a Hindu. Does that mean Hinduism threatened his conviction or did the political Hindus do so?

Write a comment ...

The Drain Team

The Drain is a news, analysis, opinion and information initiative. We shed light on the overlooked stories which are shaping the contemporary world. We aim to bring out stories which are usually ditched and drained by the mainstream media, but are of utmost importance to the people.